The Fed’s made-up Minutes

Well, if you were left in any doubt that the Fed wanted to deliver an asset boom to ensure a Trump 2020 victory, tonight’s Minutes should eradicate that. We have never seen anything like it.

The first half of the Minutes describe the strength of the US economy:

‘labor market conditions remained strong’
‘GDP… rising at a moderate rate’
‘household spending growth picked up’
‘survey-based measures of inflation expectations were little changed’
‘Michigan consumer sentiment… still at upbeat level’

Sure, forecasts for inflation and GDP were trimmed slightly: ‘The projection for U.S. economic activity prepared by the staff for the June FOMC meeting was revised down somewhat on balance.’

But what’s this? What’s the market doing you say?
‘The spread between 10-year and 3-month Treasury yields fell to the bottom decile of its distribution since 1971’

And what’s happened recently?
‘Participants judged that uncertainties and downside risks surrounding the economic outlook had increased significantly over recent weeks.’

OMG! And why is that? Is it because of some stuff you heard some guy say somewhere anecdotally?
contacts reported that softer export sales, weaker economic activity abroad, and elevated levels of uncertainty regarding the global outlook were weighing on business sentiment …. Several participants noted comments from business contacts reporting that their base case now assumed that uncertainties about the global outlook would remain prominent over the medium term and would continue to act as a drag on investment. Several participants also noted reports from some business contacts in the manufacturing sector suggesting that they were putting capital expenditures or hiring plans on hold and were reevaluating their global supply chains in light of trade uncertainties.’

And you know that data in the first half of the Minutes? Maybe it’s not telling the whole story, particularly on inflation right? Bad stuff could happen, couldn’t it? 
Some participants also noted that recent readings on some survey measures of consumers’ inflation expectations had declined or stood at historically low levels. Many participants further noted that longer-term inflation expectations could be somewhat below levels consistent with the Committee’s 2 percent inflation objective, or that the continued weakness in inflation could prompt expectations to slip further’

What kind of bad stuff could happen? Debt ceiling issues, or heavily indebted firms getting into trouble, or, um…. you know. Things.

And then we come to the crux of it:
While overall financial conditions remained supportive of growth, those conditions appeared to be premised importantly on expectations that the Federal Reserve would ease policy in the near term to help offset the drag on economic growth stemming from uncertainties about the global outlook and other downside risks.’

That’s right guys! We have to cut because we are expected to cut!

They then throw around some reasons for cutting:

  • ‘risk management’
  • ‘continued shortfall in inflation’ could weigh on inflation expectations
  • ‘lower natural rate of unemployment’ could mean inflation never gets going (the Clarida argument)

There we are then. Almost total capture of the Federal Reserve by greedy financial markets and a greedy President. There are a few holdouts to this madness however:
A few participants expressed the view that with the economy still in a favorable position in terms of the dual mandate, an easing of policy in an attempt to increase inflation a few tenths of a percentage point risked overheating the labor markets and fueling financial imbalances’.

Good of them to get their reservations on record, but there is only a few of them, and they’ll likely quit the Fed in the years ahead anyway before this all blows up in their face.

Powell has his rate cut excuses ready. Just look at what he said in his testimony:
‘Economic momentum appears to have slowed in some major foreign economies, and that weakness could affect the U.S. economy. Moreover, a number of government policy issues have yet to be resolved, including trade developments, the federal debt ceiling, and Brexit.’

The word ‘Brexit’ comes up just once in the Minutes. When was the last time the Fed cared about what was going on in the rest of the world? It’s the most important central bank in the world, isn’t it?

So now we know. They will be using the 3month-10year yield curve to signal recession risk. That you have to cut now or suffer the consequences later. They’ll argue stuff could weigh on inflation. They’ll point to trade tensions, geopolitics, Brexit, whatever. It doesn’t matter. They’re cutting.


Peter Davey

Well done! I’ve just become aware of your site and it’s good to see somebody able and willing to spot the fact that the Emperor is in fact, stark naked……..

With the 50th anniversary of the moon landing having just passed, we approach the same milestone for the demise of the gold standard, which started this inexorable descent in to madness. Any analysis of the 300 years of modern capitalism will show that It’s NEVER, EVER, “different this time”. Of course, Nixon and his successors knew that fiat money would be somebody else’s problem but who is going to be in charge when the music stops?

I look forward to following your blogs.

Sam Robins

Thanks and hope you find it useful – please sign up to the regular emails if you haven’t done so already!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.